<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Church Techy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churchtechy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churchtechy.com</link>
	<description>Where Tech meets Church</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Spying On Staff by Spying on Staff 2 &#8211; Benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/spying-on-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Spying on Staff 2 &#8211; Benefits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1305#comment-799</guid>
		<description>[...] in part one of this mini-epic I responded to a comment author on another blog. In it, I addressed the, as I see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in part one of this mini-epic I responded to a comment author on another blog. In it, I addressed the, as I see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spying On Staff by Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/spying-on-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1305#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Ken thanks for the comment even though it&#039;s a blatant advert :) 
 
Let me ask you a question or two if I may? Most companies such as yours advertise your tools as &quot;spying&quot; tools and I see that as a way too emotive word. That being the case why do you think companies such as yours brand it as such? 
 
Secondly, the other thing that springs to mind is the question of &quot;the tools don&#039;t work anyway&quot; - how would you respond to that? If you prefer, drop me an email and we&#039;ll turn it into a Q&amp;A as I don&#039;t mind helping companies out - and I&#039;ve never heard of yours. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken thanks for the comment even though it&#039;s a blatant advert :) </p>
<p>Let me ask you a question or two if I may? Most companies such as yours advertise your tools as &quot;spying&quot; tools and I see that as a way too emotive word. That being the case why do you think companies such as yours brand it as such? </p>
<p>Secondly, the other thing that springs to mind is the question of &quot;the tools don&#039;t work anyway&quot; &#8211; how would you respond to that? If you prefer, drop me an email and we&#039;ll turn it into a Q&amp;A as I don&#039;t mind helping companies out &#8211; and I&#039;ve never heard of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spying On Staff by KenS</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/spying-on-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>KenS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1305#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Use something like our office productivity tool, The Office Software (theOS) or our home/family software PC Pandora. Either way, if you own a computer that someone else uses -- even in a church -- you have the right and the responsibility to know how that machine is used. if the users complain about &quot;privacy&quot; tell them 2 things: 1) there is no privacy on the Internet, so stop right there, but also 2) this is MY machine and I need to know how it is used. you want privacy &#8211; stay home and lock your doors and close the blinds. 
heh he 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcpandora.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.pcpandora.com&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theofficesoftware.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.theofficesoftware.com&lt;/a&gt;    
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use something like our office productivity tool, The Office Software (theOS) or our home/family software PC Pandora. Either way, if you own a computer that someone else uses &#8212; even in a church &#8212; you have the right and the responsibility to know how that machine is used. if the users complain about &quot;privacy&quot; tell them 2 things: 1) there is no privacy on the Internet, so stop right there, but also 2) this is MY machine and I need to know how it is used. you want privacy &ndash; stay home and lock your doors and close the blinds.<br />
heh he </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpandora.com" target="_blank">http://www.pcpandora.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.theofficesoftware.com" target="_blank">http://www.theofficesoftware.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spying On Staff by Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/spying-on-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1305#comment-793</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a valid idea but not one that bears a great deal of scrutiny. Why? Well it&#039;s the same argument being put forward by the current UK government to bring in swinging changes in personal freedoms and liberty. 
 
The sentiment is accurate though. If one is simply doing their work then they have no reason to wrry about what is implemented so long as it isn&#039;t intrusive and the monitoring policy is well documented beforehand. 
 
The main point is that the equipment doesn&#039;t belong to the employee and there is no expectation of privacy .. or is there? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s a valid idea but not one that bears a great deal of scrutiny. Why? Well it&#039;s the same argument being put forward by the current UK government to bring in swinging changes in personal freedoms and liberty. </p>
<p>The sentiment is accurate though. If one is simply doing their work then they have no reason to wrry about what is implemented so long as it isn&#039;t intrusive and the monitoring policy is well documented beforehand. </p>
<p>The main point is that the equipment doesn&#039;t belong to the employee and there is no expectation of privacy .. or is there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spying On Staff by Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/spying-on-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1305#comment-792</guid>
		<description>All very good and interesting ideas that have been put forward. Another thing I would add, is that some people within the church may become offended that there is a monitoring policy being implemented. But in light of the statistics posted above, I would respond to that person, &quot;if you&#039;re not doing anything wrong then there&#039;s no reason to worry&quot; :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very good and interesting ideas that have been put forward. Another thing I would add, is that some people within the church may become offended that there is a monitoring policy being implemented. But in light of the statistics posted above, I would respond to that person, &quot;if you&#039;re not doing anything wrong then there&#039;s no reason to worry&quot; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Personal Data Security by stubbyd</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/02/personal-data-security/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1288#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Ah of course - an option I hadn&#039;t considered but an equally valid one. Thanks for the comment Liv.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah of course &#8211; an option I hadn&#39;t considered but an equally valid one. Thanks for the comment Liv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Personal Data Security by stubbyd</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/02/personal-data-security/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>stubbyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1288#comment-774</guid>
		<description>Ah of course - an option I hadn&#039;t considered but an equally valid one. Thanks for the comment Liv.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah of course &#8211; an option I hadn&#39;t considered but an equally valid one. Thanks for the comment Liv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Personal Data Security by Livia</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/02/personal-data-security/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Livia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1288#comment-773</guid>
		<description>My partner had a serious head injury in October after a bicycle accident resulting in memory loss. He has managed to piece things together and find his way back into his email accounts, computers and everything, and even remember his PINs for banking, but it was a challenge.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner had a serious head injury in October after a bicycle accident resulting in memory loss. He has managed to piece things together and find his way back into his email accounts, computers and everything, and even remember his PINs for banking, but it was a challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
