<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sunday Rant. Why or Why Not?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/sunday-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/sunday-rant/</link> <description>where Tech meets church</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Stuart</title><link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/sunday-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link> <dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:52:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1409#comment-842</guid> <description>Tx for teh comment Darrell.
Re-reading my post and your comment makes me realise I wasn&#039;t clear enough ... I guess. I was really trying to aim for the POV of &quot;don&#039;t tell me what I should do but explain it&quot;.
I agree with the don&#039;t auto follow all - I too don&#039;t want porn accounts. Fortunately spam accounts seem to get flagged up very quickly - but I flagged it as another example of the &quot;Twitter Etiquette Nonsense&quot; - at least as I see it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tx for teh comment Darrell.</p><p>Re-reading my post and your comment makes me realise I wasn&#039;t clear enough &#8230; I guess. I was really trying to aim for the POV of &quot;don&#039;t tell me what I should do but explain it&quot;.</p><p>I agree with the don&#039;t auto follow all &#8211; I too don&#039;t want porn accounts. Fortunately spam accounts seem to get flagged up very quickly &#8211; but I flagged it as another example of the &quot;Twitter Etiquette Nonsense&quot; &#8211; at least as I see it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dljordaneku</title><link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2010/03/sunday-rant/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link> <dc:creator>dljordaneku</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:48:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1409#comment-841</guid> <description>&quot;What harm can really come in auto-following someone?&quot;
I do like this one though. There are way to many spammers and porn accounts out there. I really don&#039;t have time to go out there and remove them after I automatically followed them.
There are also a lot of people out there that follow anyone and everyone who&#039;s account won&#039;t get suspended because they are legit accounts for various companies or other stuff.
Doesn&#039;t mean I want their stuff in my timeline. Again, I just don&#039;t have the time to just go remove people I follow just because someone wanted to promote something I have no interest in. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What harm can really come in auto-following someone?&quot;</p><p>I do like this one though. There are way to many spammers and porn accounts out there. I really don&#039;t have time to go out there and remove them after I automatically followed them.</p><p>There are also a lot of people out there that follow anyone and everyone who&#039;s account won&#039;t get suspended because they are legit accounts for various companies or other stuff.</p><p>Doesn&#039;t mean I want their stuff in my timeline. Again, I just don&#039;t have the time to just go remove people I follow just because someone wanted to promote something I have no interest in.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.churchtechy.com @ 2012-05-18 07:51:09 by W3 Total Cache -->
