<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Top 5 Free Security Tools.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/</link>
	<description>Where Tech meets Church</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 Tips #2</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 Tips #2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1058#comment-616</guid>
		<description>[...] still disable the MS firewall and use a third party addin such as Comodo or Tall Emu &#8211; see my post from yesterday about my top 5 free security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still disable the MS firewall and use a third party addin such as Comodo or Tall Emu &#8211; see my post from yesterday about my top 5 free security [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wvpv</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>wvpv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1058#comment-607</guid>
		<description>We Symantec Corporate Edition on our Windows Active Directory server.  Centralized admin and LiveUpdate deployment to all of the clients.  It&#039;s nice. 
 
Nod32 is what I run on my main machine at home.   I like it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We Symantec Corporate Edition on our Windows Active Directory server.  Centralized admin and LiveUpdate deployment to all of the clients.  It&#039;s nice. </p>
<p>Nod32 is what I run on my main machine at home.   I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1058#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg ... malwarebytes has to be a close second to SuperAntiSpyware for me. I have and run both but find the SAS just nips malwarebytes in the bud in terms of performance and findings, etc ... 
 
Spybot and AdAware (ala lavasoft) were always the two I used toi run but they became long in the tooth and slow on updates for a while - not good when you want to deal with malware. 
 
Ah yes - ccleaner. The tool I forget but use. It has caused me any number of head scratching sessions when I can&#039;t work out why I have no recent documents in the MRU list ...  then I remember I have it set to hyper agressive mode! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg &#8230; malwarebytes has to be a close second to SuperAntiSpyware for me. I have and run both but find the SAS just nips malwarebytes in the bud in terms of performance and findings, etc &#8230; </p>
<p>Spybot and AdAware (ala lavasoft) were always the two I used toi run but they became long in the tooth and slow on updates for a while &#8211; not good when you want to deal with malware. </p>
<p>Ah yes &#8211; ccleaner. The tool I forget but use. It has caused me any number of head scratching sessions when I can&#039;t work out why I have no recent documents in the MRU list &#8230;  then I remember I have it set to hyper agressive mode!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1058#comment-605</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve not yet had time or a (un)willing PC to try out MSE. 
 
Reports I&#039;ve heard have all been good though which, I admit, surprises me. I said to @scamtypes earlier that I have an ingrained distrust of anything that comes out of Redmond and purports to be a security product. 
 
Nice to hear a positive response about Symantec as well. For years I&#039;ve been a fan of McAfee but I realised a while back that it suits a corporate setup but becomes bloatware when on an individuals PC at home. My Church runs Nod32 which gets better and better in my opinion. Its interface was out of the dark ages, but since they improved that then there is little to fault it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve not yet had time or a (un)willing PC to try out MSE. </p>
<p>Reports I&#039;ve heard have all been good though which, I admit, surprises me. I said to @scamtypes earlier that I have an ingrained distrust of anything that comes out of Redmond and purports to be a security product. </p>
<p>Nice to hear a positive response about Symantec as well. For years I&#039;ve been a fan of McAfee but I realised a while back that it suits a corporate setup but becomes bloatware when on an individuals PC at home. My Church runs Nod32 which gets better and better in my opinion. Its interface was out of the dark ages, but since they improved that then there is little to fault it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wvpv</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>wvpv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1058#comment-604</guid>
		<description>What do you think of Microsoft Security Essentials?  I have installed it as a replacement for Symantec and McAfee on a few computers I&#039;ve worked on recently.  Caught a few things that the others didn&#039;t and it seems like it&#039;s not as bloated.  I also have it running on my notebook.  Been pleased with it as an alternative to AVG. 
 
I&#039;ve always been of the opinion that if you can combine spyware and AV updates with the Windows Update cycle, it&#039;s less moving parts.  Granted Windows Defender hasn&#039;t ever been that great, but... 
 
Right now, MSE is not really an option for us at church.  We&#039;re using Symantec Corporate AV, which is surprisingly good compared to their consumer products (in terms of performance).  We&#039;ve never had any virus issues that weren&#039;t nipped in the bud. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of Microsoft Security Essentials?  I have installed it as a replacement for Symantec and McAfee on a few computers I&#039;ve worked on recently.  Caught a few things that the others didn&#039;t and it seems like it&#039;s not as bloated.  I also have it running on my notebook.  Been pleased with it as an alternative to AVG. </p>
<p>I&#039;ve always been of the opinion that if you can combine spyware and AV updates with the Windows Update cycle, it&#039;s less moving parts.  Granted Windows Defender hasn&#039;t ever been that great, but&#8230; </p>
<p>Right now, MSE is not really an option for us at church.  We&#039;re using Symantec Corporate AV, which is surprisingly good compared to their consumer products (in terms of performance).  We&#039;ve never had any virus issues that weren&#039;t nipped in the bud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg </title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1058#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Good list.  I too like AVG, although the latest upgrade (9.x) seems a bit resource heavy.   
 
For malware removal I really like Malwarebytes (malwarebytes.org), it seems to do a better job than the more common Spybot and AdAware.  Although I still use Spybot for some of the advanced features like digging into the registry to clean up start up issues.  For full registry checking/cleaning I&#039;m a fan of ccleaner.  Very small and very quick in what it does.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good list.  I too like AVG, although the latest upgrade (9.x) seems a bit resource heavy.   </p>
<p>For malware removal I really like Malwarebytes (malwarebytes.org), it seems to do a better job than the more common Spybot and AdAware.  Although I still use Spybot for some of the advanced features like digging into the registry to clean up start up issues.  For full registry checking/cleaning I&#039;m a fan of ccleaner.  Very small and very quick in what it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/11/my-top-5-free-security-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=1058#comment-602</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by stubbyd: New blog post: My Top 5 Free Security Tools. http://bit.ly/4yORQJ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by stubbyd: New blog post: My Top 5 Free Security Tools. <a href="http://bit.ly/4yORQJ..">http://bit.ly/4yORQJ..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.churchtechy.com @ 2010-07-29 16:39:28 by W3 Total Cache -->