Comments on: The Internet in Numbers – 2008 http://www.churchtechy.com/2009/01/the-internet-in-numbers-2008/ where Tech meets church Tue, 01 May 2012 14:49:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Stuarthttp://www.churchtechy.com/2009/01/the-internet-in-numbers-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-143 Stuart Mon, 11 May 2009 16:53:45 +0000 http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=188#comment-143 I've also now edited my style sheet so that all links are in RED to make them easier to see for any others I may have missed. I've also now edited my style sheet so that all links are in RED to make them easier to see for any others I may have missed.

]]> By: Stuarthttp://www.churchtechy.com/2009/01/the-internet-in-numbers-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-142 Stuart Mon, 11 May 2009 16:35:30 +0000 http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=188#comment-142 Actually if you bother to look I did - THREE TIMES. The very first pingdom in the post is just to the site itself. Then there's the "internet usage" comment in the first line and finally the very last Pingdom and last word of the article links directly to the full post itself. There's a problem with my theme and to get links to show up properly I need to embolden them. I''d forgotten to do that for this post but will rectify it presently. As my prior comment said - we can't win! What is it you want?? Actually if you bother to look I did – THREE TIMES. The very first pingdom in the post is just to the site itself. Then there's the "internet usage" comment in the first line and finally the very last Pingdom and last word of the article links directly to the full post itself.

There's a problem with my theme and to get links to show up properly I need to embolden them. I''d forgotten to do that for this post but will rectify it presently.

As my prior comment said – we can't win! What is it you want??

]]> By: Stuarthttp://www.churchtechy.com/2009/01/the-internet-in-numbers-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-128 Stuart Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:20:17 +0000 http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=188#comment-128 Not everyone reads Pingdom and part of the aim is to get folks to read their article. Pingdom is my initial link in the article and I finish by stating that Pingdom has the full article. Ok - so I didn't include the diagrams and all the facts, but then you'd just say I was plagiarising! Bloggers can't win - either we don't point you at enough stuff or we're too self centered. Let me ask - what do you want? Not everyone reads Pingdom and part of the aim is to get folks to read their article.

Pingdom is my initial link in the article and I finish by stating that Pingdom has the full article. Ok – so I didn't include the diagrams and all the facts, but then you'd just say I was plagiarising!

Bloggers can't win – either we don't point you at enough stuff or we're too self centered.

Let me ask – what do you want?

]]> By: c nadshttp://www.churchtechy.com/2009/01/the-internet-in-numbers-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-127 c nads Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:59:53 +0000 http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=188#comment-127 oh.. and you didnt even bother posting a link to the pingdom post that you copied.. i will take the liberty of doing that for you: <a href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/01/22/internet-2008-in-numbers/" target="_blank">http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/01/22/internet-2008...</a> oh.. and you didnt even bother posting a link to the pingdom post that you copied.. i will take the liberty of doing that for you:
http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/01/22/internet-2008…

]]> By: c nadshttp://www.churchtechy.com/2009/01/the-internet-in-numbers-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-126 c nads Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:58:46 +0000 http://www.churchtechy.com/?p=188#comment-126 this is EXACTLY the same post as pingdom, only done in a less interesting way this is EXACTLY the same post as pingdom, only done in a less interesting way

]]>