1885 Responseshttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.churchtechy.com%2F2009%2F01%2Fthe-internet-in-numbers-2008%2FThe+Internet+in+Numbers+-+2008+2009-01-24+01%3A25%3A28Stuarthttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.churchtechy.com%2F%3Fp%3D188 for "The Internet in Numbers – 2008"

1. c nads April 22nd, 2009 at 4:58 pm 1

   this is EXACTLY the same post as pingdom, only done in a less interesting way

2. c nads April 22nd, 2009 at 4:59 pm 2

   oh.. and you didnt even bother posting a link to the pingdom post that you copied.. i will take the liberty of doing that for you:
   http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/01/22/internet-2008...

3. Stuart April 22nd, 2009 at 9:20 pm 3

   Not everyone reads Pingdom and part of the aim is to get folks to read their article.

   Pingdom is my initial link in the article and I finish by stating that Pingdom has the full article. Ok – so I didn't include the diagrams and all the facts, but then you'd just say I was plagiarising!

   Bloggers can't win – either we don't point you at enough stuff or we're too self centered.

   Let me ask – what do you want?

4. Stuart May 11th, 2009 at 4:35 pm 4

   Actually if you bother to look I did – THREE TIMES. The very first pingdom in the post is just to the site itself. Then there's the "internet usage" comment in the first line and finally the very last Pingdom and last word of the article links directly to the full post itself.

   There's a problem with my theme and to get links to show up properly I need to embolden them. I''d forgotten to do that for this post but will rectify it presently.

   As my prior comment said – we can't win! What is it you want??

5. Stuart May 11th, 2009 at 4:53 pm 5

   I've also now edited my style sheet so that all links are in RED to make them easier to see for any others I may have missed.